At the dawn of the crypto age, mining farms were the norm – huge warehouses filled with computers, especially for networks like Bitcoin (BTC). But only a few years after Bitcoin’s launch in 2009, developers introduced proof-of-stake (PoS) as an alternative model to power peer-to-peer (P2P) digital assets. PoS quickly became a prominent framework in the crypto space, thanks to its lower energy consumption and potential for faster transactions.

While PoS isn’t without flaws, it’s now a popular choice for securing and running blockchain systems, powering many well-known projects. In this guide, we’ll explore PoS’s origins and evolution, how it works and differs from other protocols, its pros and cons, and real-world applications.

What is proof-of-stake (PoS)?

PoS is a cryptographic algorithm developed in 2012 by Sunny King and Scott Nadal as an alternative to Bitcoin's proof-of-work (PoW) protocol. Unlike PoW, which relies on energy-intensive computations, PoS secures transactions on P2P blockchain networks by requiring nodes to "stake" the network’s native cryptocurrency. This process encourages nodes to validate transactions accurately, rewarding them with tokens for supporting the network.

How does proof-of-stake work? 

To participate in transaction validation, PoS nodes must meet a minimum staking requirement with the network’s native currency. For those seeking higher rewards, some blockchains set larger staking requirements, while others allow users with smaller holdings to participate by delegating assets. Delegators contribute their cryptocurrency to verified validators or join staking pools, sharing in the rewards with reduced entry requirements.

While some PoS systems randomly select validators, nodes with larger stakes often have higher chances of being chosen to validate transactions and earn rewards. After a successful validation, validators receive tokens as a reward. To discourage dishonest behavior, some PoS blockchains implement a “slashing” mechanism that penalizes validators by reducing their staked assets if suspicious activity is detected, redistributing them to other validators or a community fund.

PoW vs. PoS: Key differences

In PoW, miners use specialized hardware to solve cryptographic puzzles, competing to validate new transaction blocks and earn rewards. This method requires substantial processing power, which grows as more miners join the network, consuming large amounts of energy and leading to slower transaction times during peak activity. Consequently, PoW can be less efficient for high-volume use.

PoS, by contrast, offers a more environmentally friendly alternative. While PoW’s hardware-dependent approach consumes extensive energy, PoS relies on a software-driven framework. According to the Cambridge Blockchain Network Sustainability Index (CBECI), Bitcoin mining produces approximately 88.23 Mt of CO₂ annually. In contrast, PoS blockchains have a significantly smaller environmental footprint, with some networks reducing emissions by up to 99.95%.

Are there any downsides to proof-of-stake blockchains? 

PoS has its strengths, but it’s not without its drawbacks. Understanding potential downsides – like centralization risks and security issues – gives a fuller picture of its advantages and limitations.

Centralization concerns

One common critique of PoS is that it tends to favor nodes with substantial cryptocurrency holdings, often known as "whales." Even with randomization protocols, many PoS blockchains give priority to nodes with the highest staked assets, potentially concentrating power among wealthier investors. Also, PoS chains with decentralized voting protocols may grant more influence to large token holders, which could undermine equitable on-chain governance. 

51% attacks

PoS systems are also vulnerable to 51% attacks, which happen when a group of colluding nodes controls over half of the network’s staked cryptocurrency, allowing them to manipulate transactions or even reverse payments. Unlike PoW, where attackers incur high costs for electricity and hardware, PoS lowers these barriers, potentially making 51% attacks more feasible and increasing risks for certain blockchains.

"Nothing at stake" vulnerability

The "nothing at stake" problem refers to a unique vulnerability in PoS networks where validators can support multiple network forks  – splits that create parallel versions of a blockchain – simultaneously without financial consequences. Because PoS doesn’t require costly hardware or energy to validate transactions, validators may be more inclined to back each potential fork, increasing the risk of network splits, enabling the spread of inaccurate data, and weakening the reliability of the consensus protocol.

Lack of testing compared to PoW

PoS continues to gain popularity as a promising alternative to PoW, but it hasn’t been tested to the same extent. PoS’s shorter track record means that hidden issues or design flaws could still surface, especially as it handles higher transaction volumes and faces volatile market conditions.

Examples of proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies

The scalability and efficiency of PoS make it a compelling choice for developers building fast, low-cost, user-friendly cryptocurrencies. Although Bitcoin still relies on a PoW model, several prominent altcoins use PoS to secure their networks: 

• Ethereum (ETH): Ethereum introduced "smart contracts," enabling third-party developers to build decentralized applications (dApps). Initially a PoW network, Ethereum transitioned to PoS in 2022 to improve scalability and reduce carbon emissions. While this shift didn’t dramatically lower gas fees or speed up transactions on the mainnet, it significantly decreased Ethereum’s carbon footprint.
• Solana (SOL): Known for its high-speed processing, Solana is a smart contract blockchain supporting dApps in areas like decentralized finance (DeFi), web3 gaming, and non-fungible token (NFT) trading. Solana’s consensus model combines PoS with a unique mechanism called proof-of-history (PoH). This hybrid design allows Solana to process thousands of transactions per second at a low cost, making it a popular choice for high-throughput applications.
• Cardano (ADA): Created by Charles Hoskinson, a former Ethereum developer, Cardano uses a PoS variation called the "Ouroboros consensus algorithm." With a strong focus on scalability, security, and sustainability, Cardano’s development follows a peer-reviewed process and includes collaborations with academic institutions.
• Polkadot (DOT): Founded by Gavin Wood, another ex-Ethereum developer, Polkadot aims to preserve developer autonomy. Its unique architecture features a central relay chain, which coordinates the network, and multiple parachains, which are customizable blockchains connected to the relay chain. This setup supports cross-chain communication and gives developers greater freedom to create specialized applications.

Simplify crypto tax obligations with CoinTracker 

Staking can be a great way to earn interest on digital assets, but it comes with tax responsibilities. CoinTracker’s portfolio tracker keeps tabs on all your crypto activities – from staking and liquidity pools to DeFi lending – and compiles your data into IRS-ready forms for a smoother filing season.

Get started with a free CoinTracker account today and experience how simple crypto tax reporting can be.

Disclaimer: This post is informational only and is not intended as tax advice. For tax advice, please consult a tax professional.